Michael Jackson, The Whole Man
Is it good manners? Is it out of some sense of politeness that every column I've read about Michael Jackson makes a brief bow to the latter half of his life, then moves on to massage every detail of his splendid, brilliant early career? As in: whatever you want to say about the weird thing he became, you have to appreciate how he electrified the world with Thriller.* Is it good manners or is it that we don't want to face what his gruesome demise might say about us? About our culture, I could say, except we can't just dis the culture without taking some responsibility.
How do we understand what happened to him?